Using personal interviews when hiring or assessing existing staff is too subjective. More meaningful results can be obtained from psychometric assessments. The earliest attempt to develop psychometry as a science occurred in 1887 at the Cavendish Physics Laboratory of Boston’s Cambridge University. This initiative can be attributed to James McKeen Cattell, who, in the following year, became the first professor of psychology in the United States.
The American Psychological Association defines psychometrics as using standardised testing procedures to quantify abilities, knowledge, personal traits and attitudes. One of the first practical applications of this science was developed in 1905 by Albert Binet and Theodore Simon to measure intelligence. The Binet-Simons test rates intellectual functioning on a scale for which the average score is 100 and the peak of a standard distribution curve in which outliers indicate limited or exceptional intellect.
Since then, industrial and behavioural psychologists have developed a broad range of psychometric assessments that have valuable applications in business, education and many other aspects of modern life.
We have already discussed the value of psychometry for measuring intelligence, but this is just one example of its many possible uses. For example, many private schools and universities apply this form of testing to perform a preliminary screening of the many candidates applying for a limited number of places. Similar tests have proved invaluable in helping recruitment agencies and human resources managers identify job applicants that will best meet a company’s requirements.
However, personal interviews lack the objectivity needed for an unbiased insight into the character and potential of a job applicant or to appraise an existing employee. Instead, psychologists have developed tests to assist in the evaluation of the following key areas:
In addition to the specified objectives of the test procedures described above, psychometric assessments can be invaluable aids when determining an individual’s most suitable career path. Such tests are frequently performed on school leavers to help them make more informed choices when deciding on their future careers. However, they are also of value to a company’s existing personnel.
A team can only perform at its best when each member is assigned to the tasks for which they are best equipped, both emotionally and technically. Often, this is not the case. Testing can reveal such incompatibilities and indicate how best those affected can be redeployed. In addition, as with the school leavers, these insights can help companies devise the best career path for each staff member. This investment in human capital, a company’s most valuable resource, will inspire loyalty and reduce staff attrition.
Orgro boasts a team of industrial psychologists, psychometrists, and business experts devoted to people development through measurable parameters. Please get in touch to learn more about how we can help you optimise your company’s performance.
Facebook: @OrgroConsulting
Instagram: @orgro_
LinkedIn: Orgr
Integrating Psychometric Assessments with Your HR Strategy In light of the pressures on businesses...
Unlocking Potential: How Career Guidance Shapes Professional Journeys Deciding on a fulfilling career path...
Transform Your Business with Organisational Development Strategies That Deliver In today’s rapidly evolving business...
Thriving Through Transformation: The Role of Change Management Services To cope with the rapidly evolving...